Friday
30th July
2010
What is an AGR?

An AGR is an Advanced Gas-cooled Reactor. The design was an attempt to improve on the earlier Magnox design, aiming to achieve higher gas temperatures to improve efficiency. AGRs use uranium in which the fissile part of the uranium (U-235) has been increased or enriched to 2 per cent. Like Magnox reactors, this was a peculiarly British design and no AGRs were sold abroad. Also like Magnox reactors, AGRs have a graphite core. Like the last two Magnox reactors, AGRs have a pre-stressed concrete pressure vessel, and use carbon dioxide gas as a coolant.
The AGR programme was a disaster. The first station to be ordered - Dungeness B – was 12 years late, and most of the others were late too with huge cost overruns. Different contractors were used to build different stations, and design changes meant that most of the stations are of a slightly different design.
A long campaign was run against the construction and opening of one of the last AGRs to be built – Torness in East Lothian, near Edinburgh – in the 1970s and 80s. After Torness opened in 1989, the Glasgow Herald quoted a Scottish Office ‘source’ who described it as a £2.5 billion mistake which should never have been built.
Closure dates
The remaining Magnox stations have fixed closure dates, and will all be closed by 2010, although they may close earlier for economic or safety reasons. But the newer AGR reactors, operated by the privatised company British Energy (BE), only have closure dates ‘for accountancy purposes’. This does not necessarily mean this is when they will close. These dates are kept under review and can be adjusted (in either direction) at any time to take account of commercial, technical and safety issues. It is quite likely that BE will try to keep at least some of their stations open longer. [1]
| British Energy’s Stations | Station Type | Capacity | Started Operation | Closure date for accounting purposes | Next PSR |
| Dungeness B | AGR | 1,260 MW | 1982 | 2008 | 2007 |
| Hartlepool | AGR | 1,320 MW | 1984 |
2009 | 2008 |
| Heysham 1 | AGR | 1,200 MW | 1983 | 2009 | 2008 |
| Hinkley B | AGR | 1,320 MW | 1976 | 2011 | 2006 |
| Hunterston B | AGR | 1,320 MW | 1976 | 2011 | 2006 |
| Heysham 2 | AGR | 1,380 MW | 1989 | 1023 | 2009 |
| Torness | AGR | 1,363 MW | 1989 | 2023 | 2009 |
| Sizewell B | PWR | 1,258 MW | 1995 | 2035 | 2005 |
The nuclear safety regulator, the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate
(NII), [2] requires nuclear station operators, like BE, to carry out a Periodic
Safety Review (PSR) around every ten years. These reviews are then submitted
to the NII for assessment. The NII might then require BE to carry out modifications
and improvements before it would be allowed to continue operating the station.
If it was economic, BE might decide to carry out the modifications, but if
the costs were too high the station would close. So, for example, Hinkley
B and Hunterston B will be required to carry out a PSR in 2006. If the improvements
required by NII don’t cost too much, BE might then decide to keep these
two stations open until 2016, rather than close them in 2011. On the other
hand if the costs are too high BE might start decommissioning one or both
of these stations in 2006.
There is no opportunity for public intervention in the PSR process, and the
NII is not required to consult the public on issues related to nuclear safety.
However, strong local campaigns for the closure of ageing Magnox stations
based on health and safety concerns might well have influenced decisions
taken by the NII and the nuclear operator in the past, as a number have closed
after completion of the PSR process.
[1] New Blow to British Energy Finances, by Andrew Taylor. Financial Times, 14th November 2003.
If you have any requests for content for this website, please let us know.
If you know of an online resource you think we should link to, please use our link submission form.
Join our mailing list
To receive our daily nuclear news digest, our monthly NuClear News,
our occasional Safe Energy e-journal or information on site
updates, sign up for our mailings.
Site editor: Pete Roche, Edinburgh Energy and Environment Consultancy
Site design & scripting ©2005–09, CampaigningOnline.com
Website heading designed by www.rowanleckie.com